I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really need to find a bullet during the 160 course that my older rifle likes.

They've executed identically for me. Like Every person else I rushed to find the newer SC version but have now switched again. Ideally you desire about a hundred% loading density. When you've got adequate case ability with the H4831(extended) you will be most likely greater off.

The truth that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is exactly why you might be observing increased velocities acquired with that powder, versus That which you've viewed Along with the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but relatively greater suited to a bit smaller sized situations using a bit fewer ability.

Sweet!! I am going to pick some up and give it a consider. Thanks men, I respect it! I will Enable you to know very well what I find out. I do have about a half pound of 4350 I can try out that first and find out what happens.

The one variation as I are aware of it is that the SC was created to perform by means of powder measures much better (which it does). The extended grains will not feed very well in the least in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

Did you at any time attempt H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with regular chamber. Wanting to know what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

Validate YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit advertising or internet marketing of firearms, ammunition, and related firearm factors to minors. We’d h4831 vs h4831sc like to make certain you’re 18 years of age or more mature just before allowing for you to shop our internet site. Are you presently eighteen a long time of age or more mature?

Like explained higher than, similar things. All of that is different is the size of your kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Later on. I do not know if that's true or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC due to the fact which is what I h4831sc found in the 8 lb jug and it works.

Presently making use of IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. h4831sc In addition to it remaining shorter Slash, exactly what is the main difference in these two powders, and should I swap to H4831sc?

It truly is humorous how over the years loading numerous unique cartridges in numerous rifles that I have never gained appropriate conclusion benefits with H-4831 or even the quick-Reduce Variation.

This can be an older thread, you might not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an previous thread. Please take into consideration making a new thread.

It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group right now. It can be a little slower than H1000, but shoots very good. Many thanks for the recommendation, it's excellent to are aware that I have bought options when a single or another powder is dried up.

It's possible you'll both: 1) Carry on and have the merchandise stated underneath routinely removed from your shopping cart:

The point that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing higher velocities acquired with that powder, versus Everything you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff.